Take Action
Tools for getting your voice heard
Expressing your views is important. We've streamlined the process of contacting your members of parliament (MPs & MPP) by providing pre-designed email templates. Simply click on the name to create an email and then copy and paste the text through the given link, add your name and address at the bottom, and send. It couldn't be easier!
It's not too late. The Greenbelt grab, Bill 23, was reversed a year after becoming law.
Bill 5, the Protecting Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, raises serious red flags. It goes too far, too fast - drastically reducing public and scientific consultation, gutting protections for endangered species and the environment, sidelining Indigenous voices on issues that directly affect their lands and heritage and prohibits any legal action.
ERO submission is finished but we created a letter for you (PDF or DocX). Cut and paste the content to your email and send to the following recipients below:​
​​​​
Click the the button to copy all the email recipient addresses to your clipboard
Protect Local Voices, Reject Bill 17!
ERO 025-0462, Proposed Regulations
Complete Application of Bill 17, Protect Ontario by Building Faster and Smarter Act, 2025, is extremely damaging to municipal oversight and public input, especially when paired with Bill 5. It can override official plans, ignore intensification and green building standards and do away with environmental assessments.
Call on the Ontario Premier, and both provincial ministers, to involve municipalities in how processes could be streamlined for the right kind of housing in the right places instead of limiting their local oversight even further and putting developers first.​
​
Click here for the ERO 025-0462 submission and link to the submission page. (June 26 deadline)
We've created a letter for you (PDF or DocX). Cut and paste the content to your email and send to the following recipients below:​
Click the the button to copy all the email recipient addresses to your clipboard
Safeguard 1,500,000 hectares of vitally important carbon store
Carbon store
Call on Ontario to work with the Omushkego and Mushkegowuk Council to safeguard approximately 1,500,000 ha of vitally important carbon store near shore land, coastal areas and wetlands.
​
We've created a letter for you (PDF or DocX). Cut and paste the content and send to to the Premier, Minister McCarthy (Environment), and Minister Rickford (Indigenous Affairs).
LNG Pipeline
Voice concerns about the environmental damage & stranded assets of LNG pipelines on the west coast.
Call on B.C. and federal government officials to address the concerns of Hereditary Nisga'a Gitanyow Chiefs about the pending environmental damage and disregard for their involvement - based on what occurred on Wet-suwet-en unceded lands.​
We've created a letter for you (PDF or DocX). Cut and paste the content to your email and send to the following recipients below:​
(Click and select the emails, then press Ctrl + C (Windows) or Cmd + C (Mac) to copy)
evac@nisgaanation.ca, alvin.azak@nisgaanation.ca, reception@gitxsan.ca, ENV.minister@gov.bc.ca, ec.ministre-minister.ec@canada.ca, DFO.Minister-Ministre.MPO@dfo-mpo.gc.ca, WLRS.Minister@gov.bc.ca, support@nisgaanation.ca, RCAANC.Media.CIRNAC@sac-isc.gc.ca, gary.anand@parl.gc.ca, WrittenSubmissions@bc-er.ca, communications@wetsuweten.net, info@westernlng.com
​
​
Have
your say
Minister Lecce: Get with Clean, Green Energy
Copy and paste the following letter into your email
Honourable Minister Lecce,
Despite being disconcerted when you assumed your new role as Minister of Energy and Electrification by the combativeness of your initial comments claiming that anyone supporting non-carbon emissions power generation was an ideologue, recent overtures seemed to indicate a possible turnaround regarding renewable energy sources and the call for new projects.
Hopeful for a 100% renewable energy power grid, you then stated that the government is energy agnostic and that gas plants will be part of the energy mix. Can we assume that if a financially viable coal plant was offered, that given your agnosticism, you would select this as an option? No, you would not because you know that coal is a terrible fossil fuel that contributes significantly to global warming. Therefore, you are not agnostic about what fuel is used to generate power in Ontario.
Gas should be on your list as another fossil fuel that contributes to global warming and as such should not be part of the future plans for Ontario energy generation. There are so many sources of information for a renewable energy future for Ontario, yet Enbridge and other gas firms seem to capture the attention of companies like Atura Power, and your attention. The future of Ontario’s economy (and the world’s) is new leading edge clean technology not legacy fossil fuel firms.
Two examples of the myriad sources outlining a renewable energy future for Ontario that is comprehensive, affordable, sustainable and good for the environment and the economy:
The Big Switch - Electricity in Canada | Canadian Climate Institute
Shifting Power: Zero-Emissions Electricity Across Canada by 2035
Please consider and forge a new innovative path for a carbon emissions-free Ontario.
Thank you for your time and attention to creating a better world for our children and grandchildren
Add Your Name and Address
Related articles
List of municipalities opposed to gas plant expansion
Thorold council unanimously rejects new gas plant peaker plants
Study on how natural gas can be phased out
Possible Peak for oil and gas 2026
Cost of Fossil fuel subsidies in Ontario
Cost of Canada’s fossil fuel subsidies
Kingston says no to fossil fuels/gas